(source)
IMHO, and ironically, it's anti-democratic to not allow Muslim ladies to wear the Islamic veil. When did the intent of secularism change from respecting the harmless beliefs of different religions' individuals, to imposing your own views of the world on everyone - including on those who probably oppose it?
Updates (19-Jul-10 and 27-Jul-10):
- French ban on the veil - a garment purportedly supported by Islam - will do more harm to the image of the Western world in general, and France in particular
- I support the rejection of a ban of the Islamic veil in Britain (link 1, link 2), for the reason they've cited - tolerance
- A funny part of France's ban and Spain's consideration of a ban on the veil is that these guys call the veil degrading to women. First, is France/Spain to decide whether those Muslim women feel degraded with the veil, and liberated without it? Second, what irks me is that for some odd reason, wearing extra clothes has come to be regarded as degrading, while a public show of nudity by French and Spanish females (see here, here, here, and here) is not-degrading, is not sexual-objectification of females, is not corrupting the youth, and is instead a demonstration of liberated, modern women? Tough to digest
- What about the prostitution industry of France? Is that not degrading to women? WTF!
- The ban on veil has less to do with liberating women, and more with reinforcing the stereotype of Muslims as backward
Update (7-Aug-10): A rare gust of fresh, unbiased air from America
No comments:
Post a Comment